Lead or Follow — Decision under normative constraint
Decide A. Get B. — Restore command

Decision under
normative constraint.

Decide Hold Execute

A decision is under normative constraint when the organisation internalises the functions charged with reading, interpreting, applying, documenting and processing the norm in order to support its action. Legal, compliance, ESG, risk management, procurement, DPO, internal control, regulated finance. Legal appears here as the maximum case.

Vision/ Results : 60% of potential achieved.

40% left on the table.
Perhaps the decision reaches operations having been reworked internally by a norm ?

Can the intermediate processing of an executive decision by the organisation's expert functions — legal, finance, compliance, ESG, risk, security, data… — explain the phenomenon?

II Corpus II

The decision stripped of its margins

Decisional margins disappear before executive arbitration even takes place — rendered invisible by the readings, qualifications and prudential thresholds that precede the decision.

Read →
If the answer is yes —

Begin by locating where the decision changed in form, rhythm or owner.

Install command →
If the answer is no —

Then how do you explain these phenomena otherwise?

Other manifestations →